Construction Of The Great Pyramid Essay -- essays research papers

Of the three theories on how the Great Pyramid was built, in descending order of acceptability, the most equal scheme is Clifford Wilsons followed by Joseph Davidovits and Erich Von Dnikens argument. Clifford Wilsons theory is the best because he illustrates how the pyramids were built and provides the evidence to prove his theory, however this is unlike Joseph Davidovits theory because Davidovits does not fully answer questions that arise concerning his theory. The three theories puddle similar points, but contain very different ideas on the construction of the Great Pyramid. This is transparent in Clifford Wilsons argument where he is repeatedly disproving Von Dnikens theory that the gods created the pyramids, whereas in Davidovits theory the pyramids were simply casted by means of chemically mixing Natron, aluminum and silicon to produce artificial rock. These three individuals express different ideas on the building of the building of the Great Pyramid.Clifford Wilson has t he most acceptable theory compared to the early(a) two individuals arguments. In Clifford Wilsons theory, he suggests that the pyramids were built with the heave-ho method. With the use of sleds made from wood that is easily imported from Phoenicia and rope, it is an acceptable theory on how the Great Pyramid was built. Wilson has also seen workers, using a single rope and pulley, move stones as the supervisor chants out instructions. One question that arises is how the builders were able to ascend the stones into place. Wilson explains that during the construction of the pyramid, a ramp made of primer coat could be increased as the height of the pyramid increased. Once outer limestone blocks are fitted into place the earth could simply be removed. Clifford Wilson clearly verifies his theory with specific details, which displays that his theory is the most logical and suitable explanation of the construction of the Great Pyramid.Although Clifford Wilsons theory is the best, on t hat point are still a few weaknesses throughout his argument. Wilson suggests that by using a system of pulleys, opens and ropes its is possible to construct the pyramid. With recent studies, it has been shown that if using a lever system as Wilson suggests, the fulcrums height must be increased, and at certain heights, the whole lever can become unstable. Another problem that is brought up is with the use of... ...nce. Von Dnikens theory is clearly the worst when compared to the other two arguments, and this is particularly due to incorrect information.Even though Von Dnikens theory is the poorest in quality, he still brings up important ideas that need to be examined. For example, the Egyptians knew the distance between the sun and the earth, and the geographical locations of other continents. This information could have been thought up, but it is more realistic to consider that Egyptians did have contact with extra-terrestrials. Despite Von Dnikens bad theory , he still brings up key issues, but generally his theory is of no use because of the lack of significant data. Of the three theories, Clifford Wilsons theory remains the most acceptable because he illustrates how the pyramids were built and provides the evidence to prove his argument. Joseph Davidovits on the other hand, does not fully answer questions that arise concerning his theory. Von Dnikens theory contains incorrect and irrelevant data that makes his theory the worst when compared to the other two arguments. In conclusion, Clifford Wilson had many effective points that disproved many Davidovits and Von Dnikens points.